Free CompTIA SecurityX / CASP+ CAS-005 Actual Exam Questions - Question 15 Discussion

B makes sense because if the vendor changes product offerings, you can’t easily switch or adapt without headaches. D also fits since being locked in often means that service quality might drop but you have no alternatives. A, E, and F actually describe benefits or flexibility, which are the opposite of lock-in risks. C isn’t really about risk either. So B and D seem like the only solid choices here.

Maybe B and D make the most sense. Vendor lock-in means you can’t easily switch, so if the vendor changes stuff (B) or drops service quality (D), you’re stuck dealing with it.

Yeah, B and D seem right. The vendor changing product offerings (B) means you're forced to adapt or lose out, which is a classic lock-in risk. And decreased quality of service (D) happens because locked-in clients have less leverage to demand improvements. The others look like benefits or neutral impacts, so they don’t fit with the concept of vendor lock-in risks.

B/D? If a vendor changes what they offer (B), you’re stuck adapting or losing out. Lower service quality (D) fits too since locked-in customers often get less attention or innovation.

It’s definitely B and D for me too. Another way to look at it: A and E suggest flexibility (moving data and multicloud), which is the opposite of lock-in. F talks about increased interoperability, which would reduce lock-in risk, not increase it. So those can be ruled out easily. That leaves B and D as the real risks — vendors changing offerings unexpectedly and clients getting stuck with lower service quality.

It’s B and D, since changing offerings and worse service fit lock-in risks perfectly.

Option B sticks out because if the vendor changes product offerings, you might get stuck with something that doesn’t fit your needs anymore. Option D makes sense since locked-in clients often face worse service quality over time.

Options B and D seem like the risks here.