Free Cisco 300-730 SVPN Actual Exam Questions
Dumps Box (DumpsBox) offers up-to-date practice exam questions for SVPN 300-730 certification exam which are developed and validated by Cisco subject domain experts certified in Cisco 300-730 SVPN . These practice questions are update regularly as we keep an eye on any recent changes in SVPN 300-730 syllabus, and when there is update our team quickly adjusts the questions. This commitment to providing the best quality exam prep material to certification aspirants is what makes DumpsBox.com the best certification exam prep website. On top of that, our strong, yet strictly moderated, community based feedback keeps the content clean and current. Each question has helpful community discussion that provides it extra perspective and introduces helpful resources for better exam preparation. This also saves students from other outdated practice questions or illicit exam dumps that can have adverse affects on career. Browse through our Cisco 300-730 SVPN exam questions and pass your exam on first try.
upcoming Cisco AnyConnect deployment. A list of the security requirements from upper
management are: the ability to force AnyConnect users to use complex passwords such as
C1$c0451035084!, warn users a few days before their password expires, and allow users to change
their password during a remote access session. Which authentication protocol must be used to meet
these requirements?
That’s a good point about RADIUS mostly just forwarding requests without enforcing password rules. I’d back A (LDAPS) because it connects straight to Active Directory, so it can handle complex password policies, expiration warnings, and let users change passwords remotely. Those features depend on the directory’s policies, which LDAPS accesses directly.
A. I agree with the call on LDAPS here because it’s basically LDAP over SSL, so it can communicate directly with Active Directory to enforce those password policies, including complexity and expiration warnings. RADIUS and TACACS+ mainly handle authentication but don’t manage password complexity or expiration on their own. Kerberos is more for single sign-on and ticketing, not password management. So if password control features are a must, LDAPS is the only one that really fits the bill for these requirements.
A network engineer must design a clientless VPN solution for a company. VPN users must be able to access several internal web servers. When reachability to those web servers was tested, it was found that one website is not being rewritten correctly by the ASA. Remote users must be able to access an internal webserver via the URL example.com. Which two steps accomplish this task? (Choose two.)
B NAT translation is definitely required so the ASA forwards requests properly. Without that, users can’t reach the internal server. So B is a must-have here.
The URL rewrite issue hints that just NAT (B) isn’t enough; a smart tunnel (A) might fix path handling.
step resolves this issue?
Option D, since DTLS reduces latency by using UDP instead of TCP for the VPN tunnel.
Maybe D. Enabling DTLS often helps with audio delays because it switches the VPN traffic to UDP, which is better for real-time communication like voice. A and B seem less relevant since 3DES is slower and shorter key lifetimes mainly affect security, not latency. Installing AnyConnect 2.3 (C) feels outdated and probably not the fix here unless the question mentioned version issues. So enabling DTLS is the usual go-to for improving call quality over VPNs by reducing delay.
Refer to the exhibit. 
The network administrator must allow the Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client to securely access the corporate resources via IKEv2 and print locally. Traffic that is destined for the Internet must still be tunneled to the Cisco ASA. Which configuration does the administrator use to accomplish this goal?
A Split include policy with a permit for 192.168.0.0/24 (D) makes sense because it allows local subnet traffic like printing to go outside the tunnel, while everything else (like internet traffic) still goes through the ASA. The other options either exclude specific hosts or tunnel all traffic, which conflicts with the need to print locally but secure internet access through the VPN. So, D is the only one that fits the described setup cleanly without overcomplicating or breaking the required traffic flow.
D/C? D seems best for local printing access while still tunneling the internet, but if the local subnet isn’t correctly defined, C ensures everything is tunneled securely, just less flexible.
IP address from the hub?
Makes sense to exclude DHCP since FlexVPN usually relies on negotiation for IP assignment. So A definitely stands out as the right choice here.
It’s A because the IP is assigned through negotiation, not DHCP or a pool.
connect in the Cisco AnyConnect client, but receives an alert message "Use a browser to gain
access." Which action does the engineer take to resolve this issue?
D disabling the HTTP server stops the router from forcing that browser login message.
Maybe D, because the HTTP server on the router can interfere with the VPN tunnel setup, causing that browser prompt. Disabling the HTTP server usually stops the router from redirecting to a web login page, which is why the client gets that message. Options A and B don’t really fix that underlying issue, and C isn’t relevant here since the problem isn’t about the connection protocol but the HTTP server conflict.
The GRE tunnel key (A) needs to be consistent so tunnels can establish securely and properly. Without matching keys, the GRE tunnels won’t form even if NHRP IDs are correct.
Maybe A makes sense since the GRE tunnel key is used to identify and secure the tunnel. If it’s different, routers might not establish proper GRE tunnels even if NHRP IDs match.
subnet while all other traffic is sent out to the Internet. Which IPsec configuration accomplishes this
task?
Maybe B makes the most sense since it clearly limits the IPsec tunnel to just the 10.10.0.0/16 subnet in the phase 2 selectors. That way, traffic to that subnet goes through the VPN while everything else heads out to the internet directly. The other options either don’t restrict the selectors as tightly or include broader ranges, which could tunnel more traffic than needed. So, B fits the need for selective routing better.
C imo, because it explicitly includes the 10.10.0.0/16 subnet in the phase 2 selectors and excludes everything else, which fits the requirement to only tunnel that traffic. The others either have broader selectors or don’t clearly limit the tunnel to just that subnet. Plus, C’s setup looks like it prevents all other traffic from going through the VPN, so it should send it straight to the internet as needed.
that will be passing unicast and multicast traffic. This configuration must be able to be implemented
without the need to modify routing within the network. Which VPN technology must be used for this
task?
It’s C because GETVPN is designed for multicast encryption without altering routing. The other choices either focus on unicast or require routing tweaks, so GETVPN fits best here.
Makes sense to pick C since GETVPN encrypts multicast efficiently and keeps existing routing intact. The other options usually need routing adjustments or don’t handle multicast as cleanly. C it is.
A network engineer is reconfiguring clientless SSLVPN during a maintenance window, and after
testing the new configuration, is unable to establish the connection. What must be done to
remediate this problem?
Maybe B is the answer here. Even if client services are enabled on the outside interface, the group policy needs to have clientless protocol enabled for users to actually establish a clientless SSLVPN session. Without that, the connection would fail after initial negotiation. The exhibit probably shows client services already enabled, so the missing piece looks like the group policy setting.
Maybe A is the key here. Without client services enabled on the outside interface, the SSLVPN won’t even negotiate a session regardless of group policy settings. The group policy controls what’s allowed once connected, but if the interface isn’t set up to handle clientless SSLVPN traffic, the connection can’t start. So before tweaking group policy stuff, double-check that client services are enabled on the outside interface first.
supporting 25,000 simultaneous users. Which load balancing method meets this requirement?
B imo, DNS is straightforward for directing large user loads without extra complexity.
Makes sense to rule out A since one profile per site wouldn’t really balance load across all 12 headends. D sounds more like a routing-level thing rather than user distribution for VPN sessions. That leaves B and C. If the infrastructure doesn’t explicitly mention AnyConnect native load balancing support, B is safer, as DNS load balancing can evenly direct users to different VPN headends just by resolving the VPN address differently. So I’d say B fits best here.
unicast and multicast traffic that exits in the remote locations be encrypted. Which non-tunneled
technology should be used to satisfy this requirement?
Makes sense that GETVPN (D) fits since it’s designed for multicast encryption without tunnels. FlexVPN and DMVPN both create tunnels, so they’re out for a “non-tunneled” ask.
Option D sounds right since GETVPN handles multicast without creating separate tunnels, which fits the question’s “non-tunneled” part. SSL (A) is mostly for web traffic, and DMVPN (C) definitely uses tunnels. FlexVPN (B) is also tunnel-based. So if they want encryption on multicast and unicast but no tunnels, GETVPN seems like the only tech that does both.
A customer cannot establish an IKEv2 site-to-site VPN tunnel between two Cisco ASA devices. Based
on the syslog message, which action brings up the VPN tunnel?
Maybe A, lowering max SA could free up resources causing the block.
D imo, if the crypto access lists aren’t matching on both ASAs, the tunnel won’t come up regardless of SA limits. Fixing those lists might be the actual blocker here.
All internal clients behind the ASA are port address translated to the public outside interface that has
an IP address of 3.3.3.3. Client 1 and client 2 have established successful SSL VPN connections to the
AS
Maybe E fits better since tunneling the network list ensures clients route traffic through the VPN, making 3.3.3.3 appear as their source IP in browser searches. Options about traffic permits or exclusions seem less relevant.
This isn’t about same-security traffic rules (B) because the question focuses on what makes “3.3.3.3” show up in a browser when looking up the IP, which points more to DNS or NAT behavior. Options like excluding or tunneling networks (C, D, E) don’t seem relevant here either. The key is making sure that the public IP 3.3.3.3 is correctly returned, so something like A (implementing correct NAT or DNS mapping) fits better to handle that translation visible to the client.
Which type of Cisco VPN is shown for group Cisc012345678?
D imo, the absence of any mGRE or NHRP config really rules out DMVPN (B). Also, clientless SSLVPN (C) usually shows web-based access configurations, which don't appear here. Since there’s no “crypto gdoi” or group key commands, GETVPN (D) seems unlikely too. The group name looks like a standard AnyConnect client group, which typically appears in a VPN client context without those specialized tunnel setups. So yeah, A fits best from the config style and naming conventions shown.
This one looks like A to me. The group name Cisc012345678 fits with VPN group policies used for AnyConnect clients, plus the config doesn’t show any tunnel or mGRE interfaces that’d suggest DMVPN. Also, no mention of encryption or key server stuff typical for GETVPN. The lack of webvpn or portal settings makes clientless SSLVPN less likely too.