Free Cisco 300-620 Actual Exam Questions - Question 4 Discussion
10G fabric extenders. Which physical topology is supported?
A)

B)

C)

D)

Maybe D. The Nexus 2000 series typically supports being connected to two parent switches for redundancy, which looks like what option D shows with multiple uplinks. The other options seem less clear on that dual-parent connection, which is pretty standard in ACI deployments with fabric extenders to avoid a single point of failure. Plus, option D looks like it aligns with Cisco’s recommended best practices for fabric extender topologies in data centers using ACI.
B, simple direct connection fits Nexus 2000 fabric extender design best.
It’s C, only that layout clearly shows proper fabric extender uplink consolidation.
B tbh, option B shows a straightforward topology where the fabric extenders connect directly to the parent switches without extra layers or complex redundancy setups, which matches typical Nexus 2000 deployments.
It’s A because Nexus 2000 fabric extenders connect as remote line cards to a parent switch, and option A shows a simple leaf-spine setup that fits that connection model.
C imo, because Nexus 2000 fabric extenders typically connect to two parent switches for redundancy, and option C shows that clearly without extra complexity like D.
I’m pretty sure option D is the right pick. Cisco ACI with Nexus 2000 fabric extenders requires dual-parent connections for redundancy, and D shows that setup clearly. The other options don’t show that kind of redundancy needed in ACI environments.
B vs D, I think D fits better since ACI usually needs dual-parent links for resilience.
Maybe C here, since Nexus 2000 fabric extenders usually connect as leaf nodes to a single parent switch, and option C shows that clearly without multi-parenting.
This one seems tricky, I think it’s D.