Free Cisco 200-201 Actual Exam Questions - Question 5 Discussion

Maybe B makes sense too because data normalization specifically targets cleaning and structuring data, which includes removing unwanted events to keep things consistent. D feels broader and less specific here.

I think D makes more sense because data protection is all about maintaining integrity, which includes removing faulty or corrupted IPS events. Not just cleaning like normalization, but actively safeguarding the data. D

B imo, data normalization is about cleaning up data by removing duplicates or irrelevant info, which fits with removing IPS events to improve integrity. D sounds close but feels broader, more about overall security than specifically improving data quality. C and A don’t really match the “removing events” part here.

Could it be C? Data signature might ensure integrity by verifying events, but does it involve removing IPS events? Wonder if that fits better than normalization or protection here.

B/D – normalization cleans data, but protection ensures integrity by removing bad events.

D imo, since data protection often involves maintaining integrity by removing harmful or unwanted events to keep data trustworthy. It’s more about securing the data than just organizing or normalizing it.

B, because data normalization often includes removing inconsistencies like redundant events.

Maybe A fits because removing IPS events could help ensure data is available and accurate by cutting out corrupted or irrelevant parts. It feels more about keeping the data reliable overall.

Does anyone know what exactly “IPS events” refers to here? Like, are we talking about Intrusion Prevention System logs or some other data type? The question’s a bit vague without that context. Also, how does “removing” tie into improving data integrity? Just trying to figure out if they mean filtering bad data out or something else.