Free CFA-Institute CFA Level II Actual Exam Questions

Martha Gillis, CFA, trades currencies for Trent, LLC. Trent is one of the largest investment firms in the
world, and its foreign currency department trades more currency on a daily basis than any other
firm. Gillis specializes in currencies of emerging nations.
Gillis received an invitation from the new Finance Minister of Binaria, one of the emerging nations
included in Gillis's portfolio. The minister has proposed a number of fiscal reforms that he hopes will
help support Binaria's weakening currency. He is asking currency specialists from several of the
largest foreign exchange banks to visit Binaria for a conference on the planned reforms. Because of
its remote location, Binaria will pay all travel expenses of the attendees, as well as lodging in
government-owned facilities in the capital city. As a further inducement, attendees will also receive
small bags of uncut emeralds (as emeralds are a principal export of Binaria), with an estimated
market value of $500.
Gillis has approximately 25 clients that she deals with regularly, most of whom are large financial
institutions interested in trading currencies. One of the services Gillis provides to these clients is a
weekly summary of important trends in the emerging market currencies she follows. Gillis talks to
local government officials and reads research reports prepared by local analysts, which are paid for
by Trent. These inputs, along with Gillis's interpretation, form the basis of most of Gillis's weekly
reports.
Gillis decided to attend the conference in Binaria. In anticipation of a favorable reception for the
proposed reforms, Gillis purchased a long Binaria currency position in her personal account before
leaving on the trip. After hearing the finance minister's proposals in person, however, she decides
that the reforms are poorly timed and likely to cause the currency to depreciate. She issues a
negative recommendation upon her return. Before issuing the recommendation, she liquidates the
long position in her personal account but does not take a short position.
Gillis's supervisor, Steve Howlett, CFA, has been reviewing Gillis's personal trading. Howlett has not
seen any details of the Binaria currency trade but has found two other instances in the past year
where he believes Gillis has violated Trent's written policies regarding trading in personal accounts.
One of the currency trading strategies employed by Trent is based on interest rate parity. Trent
monitors spot exchange rates, forward rates, and short-term government interest rates. On the rare
occasions when the forward rates do not accurately reflect the interest differential between two
countries, Trent places trades to take advantage of the riskless arbitrage opportunity. Because Trent
is such a large player in the exchange markets, its transactions costs are very low, and Trent is often
able to take advantage of mispricings that are too small for others to capitalize on. In describing
these trading opportunities to clients, Trent suggests that "clients willing to participate in this type of
arbitrage strategy are guaranteed riskless profits until the market pricing returns to equilibrium."
Trent's arbitrage trading based on interest rate parity is successful mostly due to Trent's large size,
which provides it with an advantage relative to smaller, competing currency trading firms. Has Trent
violated CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct with respect to its trading strategy or its
guarantee of results?

MediSoft Inc. develops and distributes high-tech medical software used in hospitals and clinics across
the United States and Canada. The firm's software provides an integrated solution to monitoring,
analyzing, and managing output from a variety of diagnostic medical equipment including MRls, CT
scans, and EKG machines. MediSoft has grown rapidly since its inception ten years ago, averaging
25% growth in sales over the last decade. The company went public three years ago. Twelve months
after their IPO, MediSoft made two semiannual coupon bond offerings, the first of which was a
convertible bond. At the time of issuance, the convertible bond had a coupon rate of 7.25%, par
value of $1,000, a conversion price of $55.56, and ten years until maturity. Two years after issuance,
the bond became callable at 102% of par value. Soon after the issuance of the convertible bond, the
company issued another series of bonds which were putable, but contained no conversion or call
features. The putable bonds were issued with a coupon of 8.0%, par value of $1,000, and 15 years
until maturity. One year after their issuance, the put feature of the putable bonds became active,
allowing the bonds to be put at a price of 95% of par value, and increasing linearly over five years to
100% of par value. MediSoft's convertible bonds are now trading in the market for a price of $947
with an estimated straight value of $917. The company's putable bonds are trading at a price of
$1,052. Volatility in the price of MediSoft's common stock has been relatively high over the last few
months. Currently the stock is priced at $50 on the New York Stock Exchange and is expected to
continue its annual dividend in the amount of $1.80 per share.
High-tech industry analysts for Brown & Associates, a money management firm specializing in fixed-
income investments, have been closely following MediSoft ever since it went public three years ago.
In general, portfolio managers at Brown & Associates do not participate in initial offerings of debt
investments, preferring instead to see how the issue trades before considering taking a position in
the issue. Since MediSoft's bonds have had ample time to trade in the marketplace, analysts and
portfolio managers have taken an interest in the company's bonds. At a meeting to discuss the merits
of MediSofVs bonds, the following comments were made by various portfolio managers and analysts
at Brown & Associates:
"Choosing to invest in MediSoft's convertible bond would benefit our portfolios in many ways, but
the primary benefit is the limited downside risk associated with the bond. Since the straight value
will provide a floor for the value of the convertible bond, downside risk is limited to the difference
between the market price of the bond and the straight value."
"Decreasing volatility in the price of MediSoft's common stock as well as increasing volatility in the
level of interest rates are expected in the near future. The combined effects of these changes in
volatility will be a decrease in the price of MediSoft's putable bonds and an increase in the price of
the convertible bonds. Therefore, only the convertible bonds would be a suitable purchase."
Assuming that portfolio managers at Brown & Associates purchased the convertible bonds, how
many years would it take to recover the premium per share?

Barton Wilson, a junior analyst, is a new hire at a money center bank. He has been assigned to help
Juanita Chevas, CFA, in the currency trading department. Together, Wilson and Chevas are working
on the development of new trading software designed to detect profitable opportunities in the
foreign exchange market. Obviously, they are interested in risk-free arbitrage opportunities.
However, they have also been instructed to investigate the possibility of longer-term currency
exposures that are not necessarily risk-free. To test the logic of their new software, Wilson gathers
the following market data:
• Spot JPY/USD exchange rate = 120.
• Spot EUR/USD exchange rate = 0.7224.
• U.S. risk-free interest rate = 7%.
• Eurozone risk-free rate = 9.08%.
• Japanese risk-free rate = 3.88%.
• Yield curves in all three currencies are flat.
In addition to in-house currency transactions, the new software program is also intended to provide
insight into currency exposure and hedging needs for the bank's major customers. These customers
typically include large multinational firms. Essentially, the bank wants to provide consulting services
to its clients concerning which currency exposures offer the greatest possibility of appreciation. In
this process, the bank will rely on deviations from international parity conditions as an indicator of
long-term currency movements.
Wilson obtains the following data from the econometrics department:
• JPY/USD spot rate one year ago =116.
• EUR/USD spot rate one year ago = 0.7200.
• Anticipated and historical U.S. annual inflation = 3%.
• Anticipated and historical Japanese annual inflation = 0%.
• Anticipated and historical Eurozone annual inflation = 5%.
One of the bank's major customers has significant portions of its business in Japan, and the Eurozone
and has long exposure to both currencies. The customer has traditionally hedged all currency risk.
However, the customer's new risk manager has decided to leave some currency exposure unhedged
in an attempt to profit from long-term currency exposure.
Wilson wants to approximate the forward discount/premium for the JPY against the USD 12 months
from now. According to the approximate version of interest rate parity, the JPY would most likely
trade at a:

Yi Tang updates several economic parameters monthly for use by the analysts and the portfolio
managers at her firm. If economic conditions warrant, she will update the parameters even more
frequently. As a result of an economic slowdown, she is going through this process now.
The firm has been using an equity risk premium of 5.6%, found with historical estimates. Tang is
going to use an estimate of the equity risk premium found with a macroeconomic model. By
comparing the yields on nominal bonds and real bonds, she estimates the inflation rate to be 2.6%.
She expects real domestic growth to be 3.0%. Tang does not expect a change in price/earnings ratios.
The yield on the market index is 1.7% and the expected risk-free rate of return is 2.7%.
Elizabeth Trotter, one of the firm's portfolio Managers, asks Tang about the effects of survivorship
bias on estimates of the equity risk premium. Trotter asks, "Which method is most susceptible to this
bias, historical estimates, Gordon growth model estimates, or survey estimates?"
Tang wishes to estimate the required rate of return for Northeast Electric (NE) using the Capital Asset
Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Fama-French three factor model. She is using the following
information to accomplish this:
· The risk-free rate of return is 2.7%.
· The expected risk premiums arc:

· The beta coefficient in the CAPM is estimated to be 0.63.
· The betas (factor sensitivities) for the three Fama-French factors are 1.00 for the market factor, -
0.76 for the size factor, and -0.04 for the book-to-markct factor.
Trotter also asks Tang about adjusted betas. She says, "We use a formula for the adjusted beta where
the adjusted beta = (2/3) (regression beta) + (1/3) (1.0). How do the adjusted betas compare to the
original regression betas?"
Trotter has one final question for Tang. Trotter says, "We need to estimate the equity beta for VixPRO,
which is a private company that is not publicly traded. We have identified a publicly traded company
that has similar operating characteristics to VixPRO and we have estimated the beta for that
company using regression analysis. We used the return on the public company as the dependent
variable and the return on the market index as the independent variable. What steps do I need to
take to find the beta for VixPRO equity? The companies have different debt/equity ratios. The debt of
both companies is very low risk, and I believe I can ignore taxes."
The estimate of the equity risk premium found with a macroeconomic model and the estimates
determined by Tang is closest to:

Glenda Garvey is interning at Samson Securities in the summer to earn money for her last semester
of studies for her MBA, She took the Level 3 CFA® exam in June but has not yet received her score.
Garvey's work involves preparing research reports on small companies.
Garvey is at lunch with a group of co-workers. She listens to their conversation about various stocks
and takes note of a comment from Tony Topel, a veteran analyst. Topel is talking about Vallo
Engineering, a small stock he has tried repeatedly to convince the investment director to add to the
monitored list. While the investment director does not like Vallo, Topel has faith in the company and
has gradually accumulated 5,000 shares for his own account. Another analyst, Mary Kennedy, tells
the group about Koral Koatings, a paint and sealant manufacturer. Kennedy has spent most of the last
week at the office doing research on Koral. She has concluded that the stock is undervalued and
consensus earnings estimates are conservative. However, she has not filed a report for Samson, nor
does she intend to. She said she has purchased the stock for herself and advises her colleagues to do
the same. After she gets back to the office, Garvey purchases 25 shares of Vallo and 50 shares of
Koral for herself.
Samson pays its interns very little, and Garvey works as a waitress at a diner in the financial district
to supplement her income. The dinner crowd includes many analysts and brokers who work at
nearby businesses. While waiting tables that night, Garvey hears two employees of a major
brokerage house discussing Metrona, a nanotechnology company. The restaurant patrons say that
the broker's star analyst has issued a report with a buy rating on Metrona that morning. The diners
plans to buy the stock the next morning. After Garvey finishes her shift, restaurant manager Mandy
Jones, a longtime Samson client, asks to speak with her. Jones commends Garvey for her hard work
at the restaurant, praising her punctuality and positive attitude, and offers her two tickets to a
Yankees game as a bonus.
The next morning, Garvey buys 40 shares of Metrona for her own account at the market open. Soon
afterward, she receives a call from Harold Koons, one of Samson's largest money-management
clients. Koons says he got Garvey's name from Bertha Witt, who manages the Koons' account. Koons
wanted to reward the analyst who discovered Anvil Hammers, a machine-tool company whose stock
soared soon after it was added to his portfolio. Garvey prepared the original report on Anvil
Hammers. Koons offers Garvey two free round-trip tickets to the city of her choice. Garvey thanks
Koons, then asks her immediate supervisor, Karl May, about the gift from Koons but does not
mention the gift from Jones. May approves the Koons' gift.
After talking with May, Garvey starts a research project on Zenith Enterprises, a frozen-juice maker.
Garvey's gathers quarterly data on the company's sales and profits over the past two years. Garvey
uses a simple linear regression to estimate the relationship between GDP growth and Zenith's sales
growth. Next she uses a consensus GDP estimate from a well-known economic data reporting service
and her regression model to extrapolate growth rates for the next three years.
Later that afternoon, Garvey attends a company meeting on the ethics of money management. She
listens to a lecture in which John Bloomquist, a veteran portfolio manager, talks about his job
responsibilities. Garvey takes notes that include the following three statements made by Bloomquist:
Statement 1: I'm not a bond expert, and I've turned to a colleague for advice on how to manage the
fixed-income portion of client portfolios.
Statement 2: I strive not to favor either the remaindermen or the current-income beneficiaries,
instead I work to serve both of their interests.
Statement 3: All of my portfolios have target growth rates sufficient to keep ahead of inflation.
Garvey is not working at the diner that night, so she goes home to work on her biography for an
online placement service. In it she makes the following two statements:
Statement 1: I'm a CFA Level 3 candidate, and I expect to receive my charter this fall. The CFA
program is a grueling, 3-part, graduate-level course, and passage requires an expertise in a variety of
financial instruments as well as knowledge of the forces that drive our economy and financial
markets.
Statement 1: I expect to graduate with my MBA from Braxton College at the end of the fall semester.
As both an MBA and a CFA, I'll be in high demand. Hire me now while you still have the chance.
During the lunch conversation, which CFA Institute Standard of Professional Conduct was most likely
violated?

Richard Grass is the healthcare analyst for Furrnon Investments and is reviewing the investment
merits of the developing hospice industry. The hospice industry has a short history in the public
market, as several companies have recently completed their initial public offering. Hospice services
are provided to patients diagnosed with terminal illness as an alternative to aggressive medical
management. The use of hospice services at skilled nursing facilities and assisted-living facilities is
forecasted to continue its recent growth. Medicare is the primary payer for hospice services,
accounting for 85% of the approximately $7 billion in industry's revenues. Hospice providers offer
symptom and pain management to patients diagnosed with a terminal illness by their physician. The
program was added to the Medicare benefit package in the early 1980s. Growth in the sector has
only recently. accelerated due to the emergence of a number of for-profit companies. The caregiver
provides a plan for each admitted patient and care is given in any number of healthcare
environments, including the patient's home.
Grass's analysis of the hospice industry has uncovered several facts that are outlined below:
• The industry's revenue annual growth rate has increased from 14% in the late 1990s to 25% in
2008.
• The average length of stay at facilities for hospice patients is increasing.
• Labor costs account for 75% of total expenses, drugs 15% of total expenses, and medical supplies
10%.
• More than 80% of hospice patients are above 65 years old and 30% are above 85 years old.
• Based on the U.S. Census Bureau's statistics, over the next six years (2009-2015), the number of
people in the 65 and older age group will increase annually by 1.4%.
• The Medicare hospice benefit is still underutilized by the terminally ill population, according to
MedPac (an independent advisory committee for the U.S. Congress on healthcare issues).
• Only 30% of Medicare beneficiaries enroll in the hospice benefit before they die.
• In recent years, the U.S. government has approved rate increases for the sector compared to flat or
declining rate trends for other healthcare services.
• The Medicare hospice program has a beneficiary cap which cannot exceed approximately $18,000
annually per person.
• The top six for-profit providers account for about half of the segment's sales.
• The overall hospice provider market is roughly divided into 55% non-profit, 10% U.S. government,
and 35% for-profit.
Grass's analysis has narrowed his search to Hope Company. Hope controls about 7% of the total
hospice service market or 20% of the for-profit market. The company has the only regulator
approved for-profit certificate for the state of Florida, one of the most attractive markets in the
United States. In addition to a strong market share in Florida, Hope has a strong presence in urban
markets like Dallas and San Francisco. Hope has a more diversified revenue base than other publicly
traded for-profit providers.
Grass's research report on Hope Company is positive on its investment merits. Grass's report states,
"Hope is uniquely positioned in the hospice industry" Which of the following best supports his
comment?

Yi Tang updates several economic parameters monthly for use by the analysts and the portfolio
managers at her firm. If economic conditions warrant, she will update the parameters even more
frequently. As a result of an economic slowdown, she is going through this process now.
The firm has been using an equity risk premium of 5.6%, found with historical estimates. Tang is
going to use an estimate of the equity risk premium found with a macroeconomic model. By
comparing the yields on nominal bonds and real bonds, she estimates the inflation rate to be 2.6%.
She expects real domestic growth to be 3.0%. Tang does not expect a change in price/earnings ratios.
The yield on the market index is 1.7% and the expected risk-free rate of return is 2.7%.
Elizabeth Trotter, one of the firm's portfolio Managers, asks Tang about the effects of survivorship
bias on estimates of the equity risk premium. Trotter asks, "Which method is most susceptible to this
bias, historical estimates, Gordon growth model estimates, or survey estimates?"
Tang wishes to estimate the required rate of return for Northeast Electric (NE) using the Capital Asset
Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Fama-French three factor model. She is using the following
information to accomplish this:
· The risk-free rate of return is 2.7%.
· The expected risk premiums arc:

· The beta coefficient in the CAPM is estimated to be 0.63.
· The betas (factor sensitivities) for the three Fama-French factors are 1.00 for the market factor, -
0.76 for the size factor, and -0.04 for the book-to-markct factor.
Trotter also asks Tang about adjusted betas. She says, "We use a formula for the adjusted beta where
the adjusted beta = (2/3) (regression beta) + (1/3) (1.0). How do the adjusted betas compare to the
original regression betas?"
Trotter has one final question for Tang. Trotter says, "We need to estimate the equity beta for VixPRO,
which is a private company that is not publicly traded. We have identified a publicly traded company
that has similar operating characteristics to VixPRO and we have estimated the beta for that
company using regression analysis. We used the return on the public company as the dependent
variable and the return on the market index as the independent variable. What steps do I need to
take to find the beta for VixPRO equity? The companies have different debt/equity ratios. The debt of
both companies is very low risk, and I believe I can ignore taxes."
The required rate of return for NE estimated with the Fama-French three factor model is closest to:

Voyager Inc., a primarily internet-based media company, is buying The Daily, a media company with
exposure to newspapers, television, and the internet.

Voyager's acquisition of The Daily is The company's second major acquisition in its history. The
previous acquisition was at the height of the merger boom in the year 2000. Voyager purchased the
Dragon Company at a premium to net asset value, thereby doubling the company's size. Voyager
used the pooling method to account for the acquisition of Dragon; however, because of FASB
changes to the Business Combination Standard, Voyager will use the acquisition method to account
for the Daily acquisition.

Voyager has made an all-cash offer of $45 per share to acquire The Daily. Wall Street is skeptical
about the merger. While Voyager has been growing its revenues by 40% per year, The Daily's revenue
growth has been less than 2% per year. Michael Renner. the CFO of Voyager, defends the acquisition
by stating that The Daily has accumulated a large amount of tax losses and that the combined
company can benefit by immediately increasing net income after the merger. In addition, Renner
states that the New Voyager will eliminate the inefficiencies of the internet operations and thereby
boost future earnings. Renner believes that the merged companies will have a value of $17.5 billion.
In the past, The Daily's management has publicly stated its opposition to merging with any company,
a position management still maintains. As a result of this situation, Voyager submitted their merger
proposal directly to The Daily's board of directors, while the firm's CEO was on vacation. Upon
returning from vacation, The Daily's CEO issued a public statement claiming that the proposed
merger was unacceptable under any circumstances.
Which of the following best characterizes Voyager's proposal to merge with The Daily?

Janice Palmer, CFA, is an international equity analyst at a large investment management firm
catering to high net worth U.S. investors. She is assisted by Morgan Greene and Cathy Wong. Both
Greene and Wong have prepared their preliminary security selections and are meeting along with
Palmer today for detailed security analysis and valuation. They have narrowed their focus to a few
closed-end country funds and some firms from Switzerland, Germany, the U.K. and the emerging
markets.
The initial decision is to choose between closed-end country funds and direct investment in foreign
stock markets. Wong is in favor of country funds because:
1. Country funds provide immediate diversification.
2. Buying country funds is a better choice than direct investment for most emerging markets.
However, Wong has observed a premium to NAV that is prevalent in closed-end country funds. Wong
is curious as to how the observed premiums would affect investments in such instruments.
In contrast to Wong, Greene is more inclined towards individual stocks and has started looking into
their financial statements. One firm Greene is analyzing is a German conglomerate. Kaiser Corp.
Kaiser has a history of growing by acquiring high-growth firms in niche markets. Exhibit 1 provides
key financial information from Greene's analysis of Kaiser Corp.
Exhibit 1: Financial information—Kaiser Corp.

While going through their sample of emerging market stocks, Wong observed that these markets in
general have high inflation and that sales for the stocks were extremely seasonal. Wong
compensated by adjusting reported sales growth in the emerging market firms by deflating the sales
using annual inflation adjustments. Wong also made upward adjustments to reported depreciation
figures.
Wong suggested to her colleagues that they add a country risk premium to the discount rate they
were using to evaluate emerging market stocks. She further suggested that they estimate country
risk premiums by calculating the spread between the yield of U.S. government bonds and that of
similar maturity local bonds.
Subsequently they started working on the financial projections for Emerjico, Inc., an emerging
market stock. Their assumptions are given in Exhibit 2.
Exhibit 2: Key Assumptions—Emerjico

Based on Exhibit 1 and using the dividend discount model (DDM), the intrinsic value of Kaiser Corp is
closest to:

William Jones, CFA, is analyzing the financial performance of two U.S. competitors in connection with
a potential investment recommendation of their common stocks. He is particularly concerned about
the quality of each company's financial results in 2007-2008 and in developing projections for 2009
and 2010 fiscal years.
Adams Company has been the largest company in the industry but Jefferson Inc. has grown more
rapidly in recent years. Adams's net sales in 2004 were 33-1/3% higher than Jefferson but were only
18% above Jefferson in 2008. During 2008, a slowing U.S. economy led to lower domestic revenue
growth for both companies. The 10-k reports showed overall sales growth of 6% for Adams in 2008
compared to 7% for 2007 and 9% in 2006. Jefferson's gross sales rose almost 12% in 2008 versus 8%
in 2007 and 10% in 2006. In the past three years, Jefferson has expanded its foreign business at a
faster pace than Adams. In 2008, Jefferson's growth in overseas business was particularly impressive.
According to the company's 10-k report, Jefferson offered a sales incentive to overseas customers.
For those customers accepting the special sales discount, Jefferson shipped products to specific
warehouses in foreign ports rather than directly to those customers' facilities.
In his initial review of Adams's and Jefferson's financial statements, Jones was concerned about the
quality of the growth in Jefferson's sales, considerably higher accounts receivables, and the impact of
overall accruals on earnings quality. He noted that Jefferson had instituted an accounting change in
2008. The economic life for new plant and equipment investments was determined to be five years
longer than for previous investments. For Adams, he noted that the higher level of inventories at the
end of 2008 might be cause for concern in light of a further slowdown expected in the U.S. economy
in 2009.
The accompanying table shows financial data for both companies' Form 10-k reports for 2006-2008
used by Jones for his analysis. To evaluate sales quality, he focused on trends in sales and related
expenses for both companies as well as cash collections and receivables comparisons. Inventory
trends relative to sales and the number of days' sales outstanding in inventory were determined for
both companies. Expense trends were examined for Adams and Jefferson relative to sales growth
and accrual ratios on a balance sheet and cash flow basis were developed as overall measures of
earnings quality.
The quality of earnings as measured by balance sheet based accruals ratios showed:

Pat Wilson, CFA, is the chief compliance officer for Excess Investments, a global asset management
and investment banking services company. Wilson is reviewing two investment reports written by
Peter Holly, CFA, an analyst and portfolio manager who has worked for Excess for four years. Holly's
first report under compliance review is a strong buy recommendation for BlueNote Inc., a musical
instrument manufacturer. The report states that the buy recommendation is applicable for the next 6
to 12 months with an average level of risk and a sustainable price target of $24 for the entire time
period. At the bottom of the report, an e-mail address is given for investors who wish to obtain a
complete description of the firm's rating system. Among other reasons supporting the
recommendation, Holly's report states that expected increases in profitability as well as increased
supply chain efficiency provide compelling support for purchasing BlueNote.
Holly informs Wilson that he determined his conclusions primarily from an intensive review of
BlueNote's filings with the SEC but also from a call to one of BlueNote's suppliers who informed Holly
that their new inventory processing system would allow for more efficiency in supplying BlueNote
with raw materials. Holly explains to Wilson that he is the only analyst covering BlueNote who is
aware of this information and that he believes the new inventory processing system will allow
BlueNote to reduce costs and increase overall profitability for several years to come.
Wilson must also review Holly's report on BigTirae Inc., a musical promotions and distribution
company. In the report, Holly provides a very optimistic analysis of BigTime's fundamentals. The
analysis supports a buy recommendation for the company. Wilson finds one problem with Holly's
report on BigTime related to Holly's former business relationship with BigTime Inc. Two years before
joining Excess, Holly worked as an investment banker and received 1,000 restricted shares of BigTime
as a result of his participation in taking the company public. These facts are not disclosed in the
report but are disclosed on Excess Investment's Web site. Wilson decides, however, that the
timeliness of the information in the report warrants overlooking this issue so that the report can be
distributed.
Just before the report is issued. Holly mentions to Wilson that BigTime unknowingly disclosed to him
and a few other analysts who were wailing for a conference call to begin that the company is
planning to restructure both its sales staff and sales strategy and may sell one of its poorly
performing business units next year.
Three days after issuing his report on BigTime, which caused a substantial rise in the price of BigTime
shares, Holly sells all of the BigTirne shares out of both his performance fee-based accounts and
asset-based accounts and then proceeds to sell all of the BigTime shares out of his own account on
the following day. Holly obtained approval from Wilson before making the trades.
Just after selling his shares in BigTime, Holly receives a call from the CEO of BlueNote who wants to
see if Holly received the desk pen engraved with the BlueNote company logo that he sent last week
and also to offer two front row tickets plus limousine service to a sold-out concert for a popular band
that uses BlueNote's instruments. Holly confirms that the desk pen arrived and thanks the CEO for
the gift and tells him that before he accepts the concert tickets, he will have to check his calendar to
see if he will be able to attend. Holly declines the use of the limousine service should he decide to
attend the concert.
After speaking with the CEO of BlucNote, Holly constructs a letter that he plans to send by e-mail to
all of his clients and prospects with e-mail addresses and by regular mail to all of his clients and
prospects without e-mail addresses. The letter details changes to an equity valuation model that
Holly and several other analysts at Excess use to analyze potential investment recommendations.
Holly's letter explains that the new model, which will be put into use next month, will utilize Monte
Carlo simulations to create a distribution of stock values, a sharp contrast to the existing model
which uses static valuations combined with sensitivity analysis. Relevant details of the new model
are included in the letter, but similar details about the existing model are not included. The letter
also explains that management at Excess has decided to exclude alcohol and tobacco company
securities from the research coverage universe. Holly's letter concludes by stating that no other
significant changes that would affect the investment recommendation process have occurred or are
expected to occur in the near future.
Did Holly violate any CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct with respect to his report on
BlueNote or BigTime, as it relates to potential use of material nonpublic information?

General Investments is considering the purchase of a significant stake in Pacific Computer
Components (PCC). Although PCC has stable production output, the company is located in a
developing country with an uncertain economic environment. Since the monetary environment is
particularly worrisome. General has decided to approach the valuation of PCC from a free cash flow
model using real growth rates. In real rate analysis, General uses a modified build-up method for
calculating the required real return, specifically:
required real return = country real rate + industry adjustment +
company adjustment
Elias Sando, CFA, an analyst with General, estimates the following information for PCC:
Domestic inflation rate = 8.738%
Nominal growth rate = 12.000%
Real country return = 3.000%
Industry adjustmen = 3.000%
Company adjustment = 2.000%
Additionally, Exhibit 1 reports information from PCC's financial statements for the year just ended
(stated in LC).

PCC generally maintains relatively constant proportions of equity and debt financing and is expected
to do so going forward.
Sando has gathered information on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
(EBITDA) and is contemplating its direct use in another cash flow approach aimed at valuing PCC.
Consider the following two statements regarding EBITDA:
Statement 1: EBITDA is not a good proxy for free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) because it does not
incorporate the importance of the depreciation tax shield nor does it reflect the investment in
working capital or in fixed capital.
Statement 2: EBITDA is also a poor proxy for FCFE.
Under the assumption that PCC maintains relatively constant proportions of equity and debt
financing, the most appropriate valuation model is the:

Stanley Bostwick, CFA, is a business services industry analyst with Mortonworld Financial. Currently,
his attention is focused on the 2008 financial statements of Global Oilfield Supply, particularly the
footnote disclosures related to the company's employee benefit plans. Bostwick would like to adjust
the financial statements to reflect the actual economic status of the pension plans and analyze the
effect on the reported results of changes in assumptions the company used to estimate the projected
benefit obligation (PBO) and net pension cost. But first, Bostwick must familiarize himself with the
differences in the accounting for defined contribution and defined benefit pension plans.
Global Oilfield's financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS). Excerpts from the company's annual report are shown in the following
exhibits.


What was the most likely cause of the actuarial gain reported in the reconciliation of the projected
benefit obligation for the year ended 2008?

Glenda Garvey is interning at Samson Securities in the summer to earn money for her last semester
of studies for her MBA, She took the Level 3 CFA® exam in June but has not yet received her score.
Garvey's work involves preparing research reports on small companies.
Garvey is at lunch with a group of co-workers. She listens to their conversation about various stocks
and takes note of a comment from Tony Topel, a veteran analyst. Topel is talking about Vallo
Engineering, a small stock he has tried repeatedly to convince the investment director to add to the
monitored list. While the investment director does not like Vallo, Topel has faith in the company and
has gradually accumulated 5,000 shares for his own account. Another analyst, Mary Kennedy, tells
the group about Koral Koatings, a paint and sealant manufacturer. Kennedy has spent most of the last
week at the office doing research on Koral. She has concluded that the stock is undervalued and
consensus earnings estimates are conservative. However, she has not filed a report for Samson, nor
does she intend to. She said she has purchased the stock for herself and advises her colleagues to do
the same. After she gets back to the office, Garvey purchases 25 shares of Vallo and 50 shares of
Koral for herself.
Samson pays its interns very little, and Garvey works as a waitress at a diner in the financial district
to supplement her income. The dinner crowd includes many analysts and brokers who work at
nearby businesses. While waiting tables that night, Garvey hears two employees of a major
brokerage house discussing Metrona, a nanotechnology company. The restaurant patrons say that
the broker's star analyst has issued a report with a buy rating on Metrona that morning. The diners
plans to buy the stock the next morning. After Garvey finishes her shift, restaurant manager Mandy
Jones, a longtime Samson client, asks to speak with her. Jones commends Garvey for her hard work
at the restaurant, praising her punctuality and positive attitude, and offers her two tickets to a
Yankees game as a bonus.
The next morning, Garvey buys 40 shares of Metrona for her own account at the market open. Soon
afterward, she receives a call from Harold Koons, one of Samson's largest money-management
clients. Koons says he got Garvey's name from Bertha Witt, who manages the Koons' account. Koons
wanted to reward the analyst who discovered Anvil Hammers, a machine-tool company whose stock
soared soon after it was added to his portfolio. Garvey prepared the original report on Anvil
Hammers. Koons offers Garvey two free round-trip tickets to the city of her choice. Garvey thanks
Koons, then asks her immediate supervisor, Karl May, about the gift from Koons but does not
mention the gift from Jones. May approves the Koons' gift.
After talking with May, Garvey starts a research project on Zenith Enterprises, a frozen-juice maker.
Garvey's gathers quarterly data on the company's sales and profits over the past two years. Garvey
uses a simple linear regression to estimate the relationship between GDP growth and Zenith's sales
growth. Next she uses a consensus GDP estimate from a well-known economic data reporting service
and her regression model to extrapolate growth rates for the next three years.
Later that afternoon, Garvey attends a company meeting on the ethics of money management. She
listens to a lecture in which John Bloomquist, a veteran portfolio manager, talks about his job
responsibilities. Garvey takes notes that include the following three statements made by Bloomquist:
Statement 1: I'm not a bond expert, and I've turned to a colleague for advice on how to manage the
fixed-income portion of client portfolios.
Statement 2: I strive not to favor either the remaindermen or the current-income beneficiaries,
instead I work to serve both of their interests.
Statement 3: All of my portfolios have target growth rates sufficient to keep ahead of inflation.
Garvey is not working at the diner that night, so she goes home to work on her biography for an
online placement service. In it she makes the following two statements:
Statement 1: I'm a CFA Level 3 candidate, and I expect to receive my charter this fall. The CFA
program is a grueling, 3-part, graduate-level course, and passage requires an expertise in a variety of
financial instruments as well as knowledge of the forces that drive our economy and financial
markets.
Statement 1: I expect to graduate with my MBA from Braxton College at the end of the fall semester.
As both an MBA and a CFA, I'll be in high demand. Hire me now while you still have the chance.
Did Garvey violate Standard 11(A) Material Nonpublic Information when she purchased Vallo and
Metrona?

Rogcrt Markets is the nation's third largest retail grocery chain, and usually has the largest or second
largest market share in every city in which it competes. In its most successful large cities, Rogert has
as much as a 25% market share, although its share is sometimes greater in small cities. Rogert is
known for its excellent customer service and has a wide variety of grocery selections in almost every
part of its stores. Its profit margins on sales are slightly above industry averages, and its return on
assets and return on equity are above average.
Rogert has an equity beta of 0.78 and a debt-to-capital ratio of approximately 50%. Recent economic
difficulties, including higher commodity prices and higher unemployment, resulted in lower profit
margins for Rogert. Still, Rogert's decline in profit margin was less than for its competitors. Rogert did
not experience substantial losses of sales from customers switching to lower-priced competitors as
its market share remained substantially constant.
Zephine Markets is one of Rogert's smaller competitors. Zephine operates in roughly 15% of the
same cities as Roger. Zephine is publicly traded, and one of the members of Rogert's board of
directors has asked the staff to evaluate an acquisition of Zephine. The staff believes that Zephine is
slightly underpriced and that it could be acquired for a 20% premium over its current price. In
recommending against the acquisition, staff member Pierre Chiraq says:
"I agree that eliminating Zephine as a rival would probably enhance our profit margins. However, I
am skeptical about this acquisition. First, because our market share is almost never dominant, much
of the benefit of eliminating a smaller rival will be shared by our other rivals. They will free-ride on
our investment. Second, if our profit margins do increase, wc will eventually attract new rivals into
our markets. And finally, our cost of capital should increase substantially because the firm will be
diversifying horizontally instead of vertically, increasing the firm's risk."
Over the last several years, grocery industry growth has tended to follow the general economy. The
competitors in the industry, like Rogert, compete for market share in a stable industry. The industry's
cyclical behavior has shown stable performance in both the ups and downs of the business cycle.
In assessing Rogert's competitive position, Chiraq makes comments about the threat of new
entrants:
"My concern about new entrants into our business is low for several reasons. Economies of scale are
achievable at a low size of operations relative to that of our firm. Our brand identity is high in the
markets in which we compete. And, finally, access to distribution channels is difficult to achieve in
the grocery business. While there are many competitive forces that concern mc, new entrants is low
on my list."
Finally, the staff discusses industry changes that might have a negative effect on Rogert's industry
position. Three phenomena are mentioned that could have such an effect. They are:
1. Industry growth rates are low and declining;
2. Several suppliers are sponsoring national television advertisements for their products;
3. The government has approved a new method of extending the shelf life of fruits and vegetables.
Rogert's success can be attributed to: