Free AWS SAP-C02 Actual Exam Questions - Question 6 Discussion
Linux VM. Uploaded files are made available to downstream applications through an NFS share.
As part of the migration to AWS, a solutions architect must implement high availability. The solution
must provide external vendors with a set of static public IP addresses that the vendors can allow. The
company has set up an AWS Direct Connect connection between its on-premises data center and its
VPC.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the least operational overhead?
Maybe C is worth considering since migrating the existing VM to EC2 with an Elastic IP gives a fixed public IP and lets you keep a familiar Linux environment. It might be simpler than setting up multiple VPC endpoints with Elastic IPs.
It’s A, since static Elastic IPs per subnet fit the static IP need better than B’s public endpoint.
It’s A because it specifically mentions using Elastic IPs for the Transfer Family server’s VPC endpoints, which gives you fixed public IPs for the vendors to whitelist. B just says publicly accessible, which could mean dynamic IPs that change. C and D involve migrating the existing VM or using FSx for Lustre, which adds unnecessary complexity and operational overhead compared to a managed Transfer Family solution with EFS. Also, FSx for Lustre isn’t typically used for SFTP or NFS-like sharing, so that feels off here. A hits all the requirements cleanly with less hassle.
A imo, B sounds risky since public endpoints might not give static IPs easily.