Free Top Amazon/AWS DEA-C01 Actual Exam Questions - Question 2 Discussion
buckets and Amazon RDS databases. The data catalog must include storage format metadata for the
data in the catalog.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST effort?
Good point about RDS engine support being crucial. Still, option B makes the most sense since Glue crawlers can recognize formats automatically, reducing manual steps compared to A or D.
B Glue crawlers are designed to detect data formats automatically, so they handle this with minimal manual work. This beats A since it avoids relying on data stewards.
I think B is the way to go too. Glue crawlers handle most common formats automatically, so you don’t need extra manual steps like in A or D. Plus, Macie (C) is mainly for sensitive data discovery, not cataloging formats. Even if the RDS engine support is limited, the question seems to assume compatibility, so B fits best for minimal effort.
Makes sense to pick B since Glue crawlers automatically recognize and catalog data formats, saving manual effort. Also, A requires extra input from data stewards, which adds overhead. One more thing is that Macie (option C) is more about security and sensitive data discovery rather than cataloging formats, so it’s not the best fit here. Scripts in D would be a lot more work and less scalable. Overall, B fits the “least effort” criteria best.
The question implies native support, so B is simplest with built-in format detection.
B tbh makes the most sense since Glue crawlers automatically detect formats without manual tagging. A adds unnecessary manual steps, and D is way more work with scripting. C doesn't focus on format metadata.
AWS Glue crawlers natively support both S3 and RDS, so B fits best here.
It’s B for automatic format detection with minimal manual work.