Free Top Amazon/AWS DEA-C01 Actual Exam Questions - Question 13 Discussion
AWS Glue job. The solution must integrate with AWS services.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST management overhead?
Maybe A is better because Step Functions natively orchestrate both Lambda and Glue jobs without extra infrastructure, unlike Airflow options which add more management overhead. Glue workflows likely don’t call Lambda directly yet.
D imo, running Airflow on EKS is definitely more complex and requires managing the cluster, so it adds way more overhead than a native AWS service like Step Functions.
B imo, running Airflow on EC2 adds a lot of management overhead compared to Step Functions. Since Step Functions natively integrates Lambda and Glue jobs, it feels way simpler and more reliable here.
A/C? I’m pretty sure Glue workflows don’t directly support invoking Lambda functions, so C might not actually work for this use case. Step Functions are built to easily chain Lambda and Glue jobs without extra infrastructure, which fits the “least management overhead” requirement perfectly. Glue workflows are great for Glue-only tasks but adding Lambda in there messes with simplicity. So I’d go with A to keep it fully serverless and managed without spinning up Airflow or relying on less flexible Glue workflows.
I think A makes the most sense here. Step Functions can easily orchestrate Lambda and Glue jobs with minimal setup, and it’s fully managed by AWS. Options B and D involve managing Airflow yourself, which adds overhead. Not sure if C can run a Lambda directly though?