Free Acams CKYCA Actual Exam Questions - Question 1 Discussion

Not B, because this isn’t an emergency situation without confirmed info. The analyst should escalate to compliance (C) to handle the next steps professionally and according to protocol.

C, since the analyst needs compliance input without official legal documents.

It’s C because the analyst should get compliance involved before doing anything else.

C/D? I’d say escalate first (C) because this is serious and the analyst needs someone with more authority to handle it properly. Interviewing the client (D) without any formal backing might not be wise since it could tip them off or complicate things. Better to let compliance decide the next steps with all info on hand. Closing the alert (A) feels risky without a proper clearance, and calling police (B) directly seems out of scope for an analyst at this stage.

C for sure, escalation is key without official proof or court orders.

Not A, because closing the alert too early could miss important risks. It seems safer to escalate (C) since the analyst found no official documents but the issue is serious and needs higher review.

C/D? I think contacting the client directly (D) might be risky without confirming facts first. Also, calling the police directly (B) seems too drastic without official proof. Closing the alert (A) right away feels premature since there’s an arrest involved. Escalating to compliance (C) seems like the right next step—they can dig deeper or decide on official reporting. The analyst should pass it up rather than handle it solo or jump to conclusions without solid evidence.

I’d go with C here. Since there’s no official court order or subpoena, escalating to a compliance officer sounds like the right next step before taking any direct action or closing the alert. What do you guys think?